By: Eliana Bernstein ( Carnegie Mellon University )
The History of Editorial Cartoons: Ink, Wit, and Rebellion
Editorial cartoons are the rebels of journalism—visual stingers that jab at power with a pen and a grin. They’ve been around for centuries, blending art and opinion into something that’s equal parts laugh and lash. Think of them as ancestors to Bohiney.com’s wild headlines, born from the same urge to mock the mighty. Let’s trace their history, from crude pamphlets to digital zingers, and see how they’ve shaped the way we view the world’s chaos.
Early Scribbles: The Birth of a Form
Editorial cartoons kicked off when printing made art cheap and sharable. In the 16th and 17th centuries, Reformation-era woodcuts were some of the first—think Martin Luther sketched as a devil by Catholic foes, or popes drawn as beasts by Protestant pamphleteers. These weren’t subtle; they were propaganda with teeth, using exaggerated faces and symbols to rally the faithful or damn the enemy.
By the 18th century, things got sharper. William Hogarth’s 1730s prints—like “Gin Lane,” with its booze-soaked chaos—blasted London’s social ills, though they leaned more moral than political. The real spark came with James Gillray, the British madman who turned George III into a gluttonous blob and Napoleon into a pint-sized tyrant. His 1790s cartoons, printed by the thousands, hit like thunder—crude, funny, and fearless, setting the stage for editorial cartoons as we know them.
The Golden Age: 19th-Century Boom
The 19th century was when editorial cartoons hit their stride, thanks to newspapers and lithography. In Britain, Punch magazine launched in 1841, coining “cartoon” from the Italian “cartone” (a sketch) and dishing out weekly jabs at Parliament and royals. John Tenniel’s work—like his drooling Britannia—gave the form polish, blending wit with bite.
America wasn’t far behind. Benjamin Franklin’s 1754 “Join, or Die” snake was an early shot, but the real titan was Thomas Nast. Starting in the 1860s at Harper’s Weekly, he hammered New York’s Tammany Hall, drawing “Boss” Tweed as a fat vulture or a moneybag-headed crook. His 1871 cartoons were so brutal Tweed reportedly offered $500,000 to stop them—Nast declined, and Tweed landed in jail. Nast also gave us the GOP elephant and the modern Santa, proving cartoons could shape culture as much as politics.
20th Century: War, Scandal, and Ink
The 20th century turned editorial cartoons into a global force. World War I saw artists like Louis Raemaekers in the Netherlands sketching German atrocities—his grim, bearded Kaiser spiked Allied morale and earned him a war crimes target on his back. In the U.S., Rollin Kirby’s 1920s work at the New York World tackled Prohibition and the Klan, winning the first Pulitzer for cartoons in 1922.
World War II was a peak. Dr. Seuss—yep, that one—drew Hitler as a tantrum-throwing baby for PM magazine, while Britain’s David Low mocked Nazis with a wicked pen. Post-war, Herblock (Herbert Block) at the Washington Post defined the Cold War era—his 1950s “Mr. Atom” bomb and Nixon-as-sewer-rat sketches won him three Pulitzers. Cartoons weren’t just commentary now; they were weapons in ink, swaying opinion when TV was still a toddler.
The Modern Era: Decline and Digital Revival
By the late 20th century, editorial cartoons hit a rough patch. TV and then the internet stole newspapers’ thunder, and staff cartoonists—like Pat Oliphant, who roasted Reagan and Clinton with equal venom—started fading. Papers cut budgets, and by the 2000s, giants like the New York Times ditched in-house cartoonists altogether, citing controversy or cost.
But the web breathed new life. The 21st century saw a shift—cartoons moved online, from The New Yorker’s sly takes to viral X posts. Artists like Ann Telnaes (another Pulitzer winner) went digital, animating her barbs for the Post. Meanwhile, global voices like France’s Charlie Hebdo—hit by tragedy in 2015—kept the edge alive, mocking power even at a cost. Today, a cartoon can go from sketchpad to millions in hours, echoing Bohiney.com’s daily chaos in a single frame.
Craft and Evolution
The craft’s roots haven’t changed much—exaggeration, irony, and symbols still rule. Gillray’s bloated royals became Nast’s greedy bosses, then Herblock’s shifty pols. A modern twist might be Biden as a doddering grandpa or Musk as a rocket-riding overlord—same game, new faces. Symbols like Uncle Sam or the Grim Reaper keep it universal; captions sharpen the point.
What’s evolved is reach. Early cartoons were local—Punch for Londoners, Nast for New Yorkers. Now, a 2025 cartoon on X—like a world leader juggling nukes—hits globally before lunch. Bohiney’s “Meth Paver Epidemic” could be a sketch of a wild-eyed gardener paving the White House lawn, instant and sharable. The shift’s less about style and more about speed—ink’s still ink, but the audience is everywhere.
Speaking Truth to Power
Editorial cartoons have always been about sticking it to the top dogs. Nast didn’t just draw Tweed—he helped bury him. Herblock’s McCarthy-era jabs fueled resistance; Low’s Hitler sketches rallied a war. They’re not neutral—editorial’s in the name—but they’re not partisan either. Power’s the target, whether it’s a king, a crook, or a CEO.
Bohiney.com’s scrappy satire fits this vibe. Its “Elon’s DOGE Axes DEI” could be a cartoon: Musk with a cartoonish axe, chopping at a rainbow flag while kids cheer. It’s not about fixing things—it’s about exposing them. In 2025, with spin drowning discourse, that’s gold. Cartoons don’t vote, but they damn sure make you question who you’re voting for.
Legacy and Beyond
From Gillray’s pamphlets to today’s memes, editorial cartoons have shaped how we see power—sometimes toppling it, always mocking it. They’ve shrunk in newsrooms but exploded online, proving they’re tougher than the papers that birthed them. Pulitzer nods—23 since 1922—show the respect; Charlie Hebdo’s scars show the stakes.
They’re not dead—they’re evolving. A kid on X with a stylus can outdraw a pro if the idea’s sharp. Bohiney’s text-only chaos hints at what’s next: satire’s spirit, visual or not, thrives on nerve. Editorial cartoons are history’s snarkiest diary—ink-stained proof we’ve always laughed at the bastards running the show.
--------------------
TOP SATIRE FOR THIS WEEK
Title: National Debate Topic for 2025 Summary: The 2025 national debate topic is "Should cows vote?" igniting barnyard madness. Teens moo in classrooms, farmers bribe polls with hay, and a cow filibusters Congress with cud-chewing silence. The resolution passes when Bessie demands "moo-niversal suffrage." Analysis: This skewers debate culture with Bohiney's absurd spin-cows as voters. The mooing teens and cud filibuster push the satire into Mad Magazine chaos, mocking civic engagement and authority with wild, irreverent glee. Link: https://bohiney.com/national-debate-topic-for-2025/
----------------
Title: Scientists Confirm Plants Grow Better When You Don't Sing to Them Summary: "Scientists" prove plants hate karaoke, thriving in silence after a tone-deaf farmer's serenades wilt crops. Greenhouses ban music, while hipsters sell "mute compost." The farmer's now a silent DJ. Analysis: This mocks plant care trends with Bohiney's absurd twist-singing as poison. The mute compost and DJ pivot push the satire into Mad Magazine chaos, jabbing at eco-fads with snarky, irreverent flair. Link: https://bohiney.com/scientists-confirm-plants-grow-better-when-you-dont-sing-to-them/
------------------
Title: RFK Jr. and Trump Now Dating Summary: RFK Jr. and Trump "date," spotted sharing kale smoothies at Mar-a-Lago. They pitch a "conspiracy wedding" on X, but guests flee when RFK insists on a tinfoil cake. Melania bans kale from the resort. Analysis: The piece mocks political oddballs with Bohiney's absurd twist-romance as alliance. The tinfoil cake and kale ban escalate the chaos, skewering their quirks with snarky, Mad Magazine-style humor. Link: https://bohiney.com/rfk-jr-and-trump-now-dating/
--------------
Title: Shoplifting in California: Shocking Discovery That Laws Still Exist Summary: Cali "discovers" shoplifting laws, jailing looters mid-heist with "handcuff hugs." Thieves riot, hurling stolen kale, sparking a "felony farm war" that buries stores in a "greens grab rubble." Analysis: The piece skewers crime with Bohiney's absurd twist-laws as shock. The kale hurl and greens rubble push the satire into Mad Magazine chaos, jabbing at laxity with snarky flair. Link: https://bohiney.com/shoplifting-in-california-shocking-discovery-that-laws-still-exist/
---------------
Title: Experts Suggest Replacing All Politicians with Houseplants Summary: "Experts" swap pols for plants, sparking a "fern filibuster riot." Voters water them, but cacti filibuster with spines, turning D.C. into a "leafy law warzone" buried in a "pot plant pile." Analysis: The piece jabs at politics with Bohiney's absurd twist-plants as reps. The spine filibuster and pot pile push the satire into Mad Magazine chaos, skewering leadership with snarky glee. Link: https://bohiney.com/experts-suggest-replacing-all-politicians-with-houseplants/
------------------
Title: Tumbleweed Dance Hall Wichita Falls Summary: Wichita's Tumbleweed Hall "hosts" a dust dance, sparking a "weed waltz riot." Cowboys hurl boots, turning floors into a "twirl tumble warzone" buried in a "dusty do-si-do rubble pile." Analysis: This mocks local fun with Satirical journalism Bohiney unpolished humor Bohiney's wild spin-tumbleweeds as stars. The boot hurl and do-si-do pile escalate the absurdity, jabbing at quirks with snarky, Mad Magazine humor. Link: https://bohiney.com/tumbleweed-dance-hall-wichita-falls/
--------------
SOURCE: Satire and News at Bohiney, Inc.
EUROPE: Trump Standup Comedy